• Home
  • Table 3. Faculty: Comparison of Mean Responses for Male – Female and Minority – White Faculty

Campus Climate Study

Equity Study Committee Report March 2001


Navigation

Report Index
Appendix A
Appendix B
Appendix C
Table 1: Faculty Response Rate by Sex, Ethnicity and Unit
Table 2: Unclassified Staff Response Rate by Sex, Ethnicity and Unit
Table 3: Faculty: Comparison of Mean Responses for Male – Female and Minority – White Faculty
Table 4: Female Faculty: Mean Responses in Descending Order of Perceived Inequity
Table 5: Faculty of Color: Mean Item Responses in Descending Order of Perceived Inequity
Table 6: Faculty: Top Five Issues of Concern and Five Issues of Least Concern
Table 7: Unclassified Staff Mean Item Responses by Sex and Race/Ethnicity
Table 8: Unclassified Staff: Female Item Means in Descending Order of Perceived Inequity
Table 9: Minority Unclassified Staff Item Means in Descending Order of Perceived
Responses to the Equity Study


Table 3. Faculty: Comparison of Mean Responses for Male – Female and Minority – White Faculty

Item

No.

Item

All

Male

S.D.

Female

 

S.D.

Faculty of

Color

 

S.D.

White

S.D.

1

P&T methods/university

2.36

2.25

0.63

2.58

*

0.92

2.88

*

1.01

2.29

0.68

2

Communication of mthds/stds for P&T/univ

2.37

2.26

0.67

2.59

*

0.96

2.74

*

1.05

2.32

0.74

3

P&T implementation / university

2.31

2.22

0.57

2.49

*

0.84

2.66

*

0.90

2.26

0.64

4

Flexibility of P&T timelines/university

2.26

2.17

0.58

2.44

*

0.87

2.59

*

0.98

2.22

0.64

5

Formal recognition

2.63

2.49

0.91

2.90

*

1.03

3.28

*

1.33

2.54

0.89

6

University teaching awards

2.57

2.46

0.85

2.83

*

1.09

3.14

*

1.25

2.50

0.87

7

University research awards

2.49

2.42

0.90

2.65

 

1.05

3.06

*

1.29

2.41

0.87

8

Representation on committees

2.39

2.25

0.67

2.70

*

1.03

2.91

*

1.20

2.32

0.74

9

Mentoring junior faculty

2.45

2.27

0.71

2.82

*

1.08

3.16

*

1.16

2.37

0.81

10

Amount performance feedback

2.38

2.27

0.67

2.60

*

0.94

2.85

*

1.02

2.32

0.73

11

Communication opportunities w/unit leaders

2.32

2.22

0.67

2.51

*

0.90

2.63

*

1.06

2.28

0.71

12

Committee assignment

2.45

2.29

0.71

2.78

*

1.01

3.00

*

1.22

2.38

0.76

13

Evaluation methods for P&T/unit

2.41

2.28

0.71

2.66

*

0.99

3.03

*

1.20

2.33

0.74

14

Implementation P&T process/unit

2.30

2.21

0.60

2.48

*

0.93

2.84

*

1.13

2.23

0.64

15

Communication P&T standards/unit

2.29

2.20

0.61

2.48

*

0.89

2.61

 

1.09

2.25

0.66

16

Communication P&T process/unit

2.29

2.18

0.57

2.54

*

0.93

2.76

*

1.16

2.24

0.64

17

Encouragement to "go up" for promotion

2.43

2.24

0.66

2.84

*

1.13

3.00

*

1.19

2.37

0.82

18

Time in rank to full professor

2.31

2.15

0.50

2.68

*

1.09

2.65

*

1.03

2.27

0.73

19

Annual evaluation process

2.45

2.38

0.85

2.60

 

0.86

3.00

*

1.18

2.38

0.79

20

Merit salary process/unit

2.61

2.48

0.93

2.88

*

0.95

3.41

*

1.28

2.51

0.86

21

Teaching load

2.26

2.17

0.54

2.43

*

0.80

2.41

 

0.89

2.24

0.61

22

Teaching Assignment

2.26

2.14

0.47

2.50

*

0.91

2.58

*

0.96

2.21

0.60

23

Advising assignment

2.22

2.13

0.47

2.41

*

0.90

2.21

 

0.63

2.22

0.65

24

Research Requirements

2.34

2.23

0.62

2.54

*

0.98

2.64

*

1.10

2.30

0.73

25

Service requirements

2.42

2.28

0.73

2.67

*

0.98

2.73

*

1.17

2.38

0.79

26

Unit teaching awards

2.41

2.30

0.75

2.66

*

1.05

3.00

*

1.25

2.34

0.79

27

Unit Research Awards

2.38

2.33

0.81

2.51

 

1.00

2.91

*

1.24

2.32

0.81

28

Voice in unit

2.52

2.30

0.76

2.90

*

1.07

3.13

*

1.26

2.44

0.85

29

Hiring process

2.40

2.34

0.84

2.51

 

0.86

3.00

*

1.29

2.31

0.74

30

Unit climate

2.52

2.32

0.74

2.89

*

1.02

3.09

*

1.25

2.45

0.80

31

Support Allocation

2.37

2.26

0.73

2.58

*

1.04

2.77

*

1.11

2.31

0.80

32

Space allocation

2.41

2.31

0.81

2.61

*

0.98

2.83

*

1.22

2.35

0.81

33

Equipment allocation

2.44

2.32

0.78

2.69

*

1.04

2.89

*

1.23

2.38

0.82

34

Work environment

2.39

2.26

0.71

2.68

*

0.96

2.94

*

1.20

2.32

0.73

35

Flexible hours

2.17

2.10

0.42

2.31

*

0.77

2.61

*

1.09

2.11

0.43

36

Research startup

2.40

2.28

0.76

2.67

*

1.05

2.88

*

1.22

2.34

0.81

37

Grant development support

2.25

2.21

0.60

2.35

 

0.82

2.61

*

1.03

2.21

0.61

38

Instructional development support

2.23

2.17

0.54

2.34

*

0.80

2.61

*

1.05

2.18

0.55

39

Student respect

2.38

2.13

0.44

2.89

*

0.99

2.71

*

1.03

2.34

0.71

40

Collaboration

2.24

2.15

0.54

2.45

*

0.84

2.63

*

1.10

2.20

0.58

41

Annual raise

2.75

2.60

1.03

3.06

*

1.16

3.60

*

1.29

2.63

1.01

42

Benefits

2.21

2.15

0.55

2.33

*

0.83

2.52

*

1.03

2.17

0.59

43

Accommodation family issues

2.32

2.18

0.61

2.61

*

1.00

3.00

*

1.33

2.24

0.65

44

Tenure clock interrupt

2.18

2.07

0.38

2.43

*

1.00

2.56

*

1.15

2.14

0.58

45

No. Committee assignments

2.41

2.25

0.67

2.72

*

1.02

2.85

*

1.21

2.35

0.75

46

Unit research commitment

2.41

2.26

0.69

2.73

*

1.07

2.94

*

1.19

2.34

0.78

* Indicates the differences among averages of the groups being compared are statistically significant at the .05 level  on this and subsequent tables.

**S.D. = Standard Deviation on this and subsequent tables.

Responses included in analysis: 2=No Inequity, 3=Mild Inequity, 4=Moderate Inequity, 5=Severe Inequity on this and subsequent tables.

Office of the Provost
Policy Library Search

Visit the Policy Office for more information.

Green Office

Why KU
  • One of 34 U.S. public institutions in the prestigious Association of American Universities
  • 26 prestigious Rhodes Scholars — more than all other Kansas colleges combined
  • Nearly $290 million in financial aid annually
  • 1 of 9 public universities with outstanding study abroad programs.
    —U.S. News & World Report
  • 46 nationally ranked graduate programs.
    —U.S. News & World Report
  • Top 50 nationwide for size of library collection.
    —ALA
  • $260.5 million in externally funded research expenditures
  • 23rd nationwide for service to veterans —"Best for Vets," Military Times